Are we really building AGI?
Get TicketsAn evening of provocation, falsification, and the questions the AI field has never asked. Every contribution becomes part of the independently reviewed Seattle 2026 City AGI Report.
Seattle builds more AI than almost any city on Earth. The engineers here aren't trying to build AGI — they're shipping products, hitting business targets, making models faster and cheaper. But the industry wrapped around their work insists that every step is bringing us closer to general intelligence. Scaling laws. Emergent capabilities.
The program weaves provocative statements with guest perspectives from researchers, founders, and investors who see the cracks in the current AI narrative. Every presenter — including guest speakers — is subject to the same challenge. No one gets a free pass. Each statement and each perspective is open to be broken by anyone in the room. Audience challenges are submitted live and moderated against the Scientific Code of Conduct. The evening closes with a panel where the speakers and the audience go head to head on what held up and what didn't.
9 statements are presented live. Each one is built on the last. Each one is open to be broken by anyone in the room.
Every engineering field is built on a science — nature's blueprint for how to build. AI has none.
The AI field believes intelligence emerges from complexity. It doesn't. Intelligence is as fundamental to the universe as gravity.
Physics tells us the universe supports free will — just not inside a computer. Within any computational system, free will and consciousness are theoretically impossible. They cannot be built. They cannot emerge.
Every AI system reasons. None of them comprehend. Reasoning follows rules. Comprehension understands why the rules exist and what happens when you use them. Without it, AI has no awareness of the consequences of its actions — on the environment, on others, or on itself.
But not the Master Algorithm as popularized by Pedro Domingos. A single algorithm can only come from a scientific understanding of intelligence.
Name a biological lifeform born with pretrained knowledge of its environment. The scaling hypothesis has no precedent in nature.
Capitalism isn't just an economic theory. It's bound to the physical laws of the universe. ASI will sever one of those bonds. The system cannot survive it.
Democracy was invented to overturn tyranny. It was never structurally designed for long-term thinking beyond — in today's terms — 2, 4, and 6 year reelection cycles. ASI brings long-term visibility that no democratic system in the past 2,500 years has been able to fully embrace.
Nick Bostrom in Superintelligence and Leopold Aschenbrenner in Situational Awareness assume intelligence agencies aren't paying attention to AGI because it's too far into the future. That is demonstrably false.
1119 8th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101
June 26, 2026 — 3 PM - 8 PM
This isn't just an event. Every contribution at this event will be assessed against empirical and theoretical scientific standards, documented in an independently reviewed publication, and synthesized into the 2026 Annual AGI Report.
Every contribution at this event will be assessed against empirical and theoretical scientific standards, documented in an independently reviewed publication, and become part of GEA's permanent scientific record of where AGI research stands.
Read more about the City Report →For the full review methodology and grounding criteria, see the Speaker Guide.
Pricing phase shown per tier — each tier may be at a different phase
* Pro submissions are reviewed for scientific quality before publication. See Rule 11.
A two-day institutional program for organizations participating seriously in the public AGI conversation. Thursday evening: closed dinner and private GEA briefing on the state of AGI in 2026 — for delegations, speakers, and GEA principals. Friday: the public scientific stress-test.
Closed gathering of corporate delegations, the speakers, and the GEA principals. Anchors on a GEA briefing covering early AGI market disruption, how to recognize hype over actual AGI progress, where the law will be challenged first, and what institutions should be preparing for. Closed to the public, press, and Friday general attendees.
10 of 10 tables remaining · the event size limit is a precondition for the evaluative process
* Pro submissions are reviewed for scientific quality before publication. See Rule 11.
No. The event is open to anyone interested in the scientific foundations of AGI — researchers, founders, engineers, journalists, investors, policymakers, and curious members of the public. Admission tickets include attendance, audience challenge access through the web app, and after-event networking. What the event asks of you is to engage seriously with the arguments on stage; it does not ask for academic credentials.
Admission includes full event access — all presentations, audience challenges, the closing panel, and networking with beer and wine. Premium (Pro) tickets include everything an Admission ticket includes, plus the right to submit a written analysis of one or more presentations for possible inclusion in the City AGI Report. Pro submissions are reviewed in two stages (Scientific Code of Conduct, then Independent Review Board) and are published in the Report alongside the board's evaluation. See Rule 11 in the Speaker Guide for full details.
Each event is documented in the City AGI Report published after the event — an independently reviewed record of the contributions, audience challenges, and scientific standing of each position. Live streaming and video recording policies are set per city and will be announced in advance.
Yes. For sponsorship, partnership, or institutional inquiries, write to [email protected]. Sponsorship is structured to preserve the scientific independence of the event and the Independent Review Board — commercial sponsors do not influence presenter selection, review criteria, or the published Report.
Speakers are invited based on the scientific seriousness of their work and its bearing on the event's statements about AGI. If your work is grounded in a relevant scientific field (physics, neuroscience, biology, cognitive science, complexity science, information theory, or adjacent disciplines) and bears on one or more of GEA's statements, write to [email protected] with a short description of your work and the statement(s) it addresses. The full participation criteria are in the Speaker Guide.